I have spent the last two days at the Science Online conference in London. I was surrounded with people talking enthusiastically about sharing their knowledge, how to get others to share theirs, and how technology could help with this process. Just my sort of thing! Being in the midst of this community, and my recent experience of writing for the SLA Future Ready blog (to be published soon), has encourage me to dust off my own blog. I don’t feel comfortable with my spectator status anymore, enjoying what everyone else is saying, without sharing some thoughts of my own.
Over the last 48 hours I have met great people working on amazing projects, and listening to them I felt very proud to be part of a community who wants to make scientific knowledge more open and accessible. Whilst some assume that text mining, linking data, etc are a “nice to have”, but not real science, several speakers showed that these technologies could help make essential information accessible to researchers, and to the public. Quick access to information and knowledge means that the rhythm of new discoveries can be accelerated, solutions to problems found and potential cure to diseases developed.
Beyond technology, a lot was said about behaviours, and how the culture amongst the scientific community needs to change in order for the tools to demonstrate their full value. Much was said about the incentives available to encourage sharing as well as the infrastructure; the best metrics to assess the quality of science; science blogging vs. publishing papers; and the need for change in order to rewards sharing as well publishing. Some have commented on Twitter that not all of these were strictly to do with “online science”, but I think these issues are all part of the same ecosystem, and need to be resolved collectively.
One interesting aspects in all these conversations was the fact that, although it would be easy to confine them to the world of scientific research, I know from my KM experience in other sectors that these issues are commonly debated. Of course the means to provide rewards, and visibility for “knowledge sharers”, are different, but I believe that the motivations are to do with the fact that we are human, rather than what our profession is. Something for me to explorer further over the next few months, as so far I have not found any other knowledge manager working in the scientific world!
All in all a good experience, even if some of the conversations were too technical for me, as I have gathered enough new ideas and contacts to keep me occupied for a while, and will hopefully report back if the blog bug does not desert me again!



